- Cited — AM (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-12-06
“… that AM’s Twitter account could have been. It is said that the Court failed to address the proper ambit of the Robinson principle, see R v. IAT ex. p Robinson [1998] QB 929. As to this point, the judgment does not allow the appeal on this ground. However, in remitting the case to the UT on the main ground of appeal, the Court indi…”
- Cited — AS (Guinea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor 2018-10-12
“…y”, and observed that it was “much relied on by domestic courts and tribunals”. Similarly, in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Robinson [1998] QB 929, 938, Lord Woolf MR said of the same guidance that it was “particularly helpful as a guide to what is the international understanding of the Convention obligat…”
- Considered — Waterstone Estates Ltd v The Welsh Ministers 2018-07-06
“…sly put into issue, an inspector has an obligation to consider a “Robinson-obvious” point (see R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Robinson [1998] QB 929 (QBD), especially at [39]). As I understood his submission, he accepted that the Inspector could not have had any obligation to raise the issue off her own bat…”
- Cited — ME (Sri Lanka) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-06-28
“… been granted, she retorted that that was permissible in consequence of the decision of this court in R (Robinson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1998] QB 929, which decided that a special adjudicator and the Immigration Appeals Tribunal have a free-standing duty to take “obvious” points in an appellant’s favour even…”