UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 620
[1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 620
· cited by
2
· influence score
14
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 620
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
[1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 620
Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan I
Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan I
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan International Airlines Corporation (Rev 2)
2019-05-14
“…Mance J’s judgment in Huyton SA v Peter Cremer GmbH & Co [1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 620 at 637-8 and the Privy Council’s judgment in Borelli v Ting. He referred also to Cooke J’s judgment in Progress Bulk Carriers and to the passage in Chitty on w…”
Cited
—
Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan International Airlines Corporation (Rev 2)
2019-05-14
“…Cremer GmbH & Co [1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 620, 637-8; [1999] CLC 230, 251:…”
Frequently cited alongside
[1937] AC 797
1×
[1976] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 293
1×
[1979] QB 705
1×
[1983] AC 366
1×
[2012] 1 WLR 1333
1×