- Cited — Vale SA v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor 2023-11-24
“…If authority for all these propositions is needed, it may be found in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360; McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58, [2013] 1 WLR 2477; Fage UK Ltd v Chobani UK Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 5, [2014] FSR 29; Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd […”
- Cited — FN (Burundi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-11-16
“… he misdirected himself”: see Assad v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 10, at paragraph 27, per Burnett LJ, and Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, at 1372, per Lord Hoffmann;…”
- Cited — Harmohinder Singh Gill (as Trustee of the Gillcrest UK Pension Scheme) v Lees News Limited 2023-10-12
“… on a minute textual examination of the judge’s phraseology, which is not appropriate on an appeal of this kind. As Lord Hoffmann said in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, 1372 a judgment can always be better expressed and an appellate court should not subject a judgment to a minute textual analysis in order to show that the tri…”
- Applied — Darty Holdings SAS v Geoffrey Carton-Kelly 2023-10-09
“…ss) in which Lord Hoffmann qualified the effect of the Benmax case which he said was really about an evaluation of facts. It continued in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, 1372D in which he said that appellate caution applied equally to the evaluation of facts. More recently, in Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 4…”
- Applied — H (A Child) (Recusal), Re 2023-07-24
“…failed properly to apply and give sufficient weight to the principle derived from Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 and instead found that Judge McPhee failed to give further explanation for an error made by the learned judge in finding rape, which the Judge accepted was an …”
- Cited — T (Fact-Finding: Second Appeal) 2023-05-05
“…valuation of those facts and to inferences to be drawn from them. The best known of these cases are: Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1977] RPC1; Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360; Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23, [2007] 1 WLR 1325; Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [2013] UK…”
- Cited — Planon Limited v Gilligan 2022-05-10
“…bstitute [my] own discretion for that of the judge by a narrow textual analysis which enables [me] to claim that he misdirected himself’ (Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 at p 1372, per Lord Hoffmann).…”
- Cited — Anwar Gangat & Anor. v Yusuf Jassat 2022-05-06
“…in general be read on the assumption, unless they have demonstrated the contrary, that they knew how they should perform their functions (Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 at 1372G per Lord Hoffmann); and that when it comes to findings of fact in particular, an appellate court is bound, unless there is compelling reason to the co…”
- Cited — Gabriele Volpi & Anor. v Matteo Volpi 2022-04-05
“…If authority for all these propositions is needed, it may be found in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360; McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58, [2013] 1 WLR 2477; Fage UK Ltd v Chobani UK Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 5, [2014] FSR 29; Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd […”
- Cited — H, Re (Children: Findings of Fact) 2021-03-05
“…In Piglowska v. Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, 1372D, Lord Hoffmann said this about how judges work when finding facts, and how their reasoned judgments should be understood:-…”
- Cited — M (Children) v Wiltshire Council & Ors 2020-12-18
“…In [38] the President referred to the speech of Lord Hoffmann In Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 as “this vitally important observation:…”
- Cited — Haley v Haley 2020-10-23
“…The approach to appeals, as elucidated by Lord Hoffman in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, [1999] 2 FLR 763, has withstood the test of time, and continues to be the authoritative statement as to the proper approach to an appeal. At [1372] Lord Hoffm…”
- Cited — XW v XH 2019-12-18
“…As referred to in Gray v Work, at [26], Lord Hoffmann pointed out in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 at p.1370 H that:…”
- Cited — Read v Panzone & Anor 2019-10-09
“…[1999] 1 WLR 1360…”
- Cited — R-B (A Child) 2019-07-02
“…Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 at page 1372:…”
- Cited — Prescott v Potamianos & Anor 2019-06-06
“…valuation of those facts and to inferences to be drawn from them. The best known of these cases are: Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1977] RPC1; Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360; Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23 [2007] 1 WLR 1325; Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [2013] UKS…”
- Cited — Group Seven Ltd & Anor v Notable Services LLP & Anor (Rev 2) 2019-04-11
“…Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1977] RPC1; Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360;…”
- Cited — Group Seven Ltd & Anor v Notable Services LLP & Anor (Rev 2) 2019-04-11
“…[1999] 1 WLR 1360…”
- Cited — Y and E (Children) (Sexual Abuse Allegations), Re 2019-02-21
“… bear in mind the repeated warnings against interfering with findings of fact by trial judges, unless compelled to do so – see for example Piglowska v Piglowski[1999] 1 WLR 1360,ReB (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria)[2013] UKSC 33 [2013] 1 WLR 1911, and Fage UK Ltd v Chobani UL Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 5. In the last-named cas…”
- Cited — A (Children) 2019-02-01
“…ce and decide whose evidence was reliable and that this court should be “circumspect in substituting” its own view. Ms Papazian relied on Piglowski v Piglowska [1999] 1 WLR 1360 in submitting that a judgment is no more than a “distillation” of the evidence and of the judge’s evaluation of it.…”
- Cited — Wheeldon Brothers Waste Ltd v Millennium Insurance Company Ltd 2018-10-18
“…valuation of those facts and to inferences to be drawn from them. The best known of these cases are: Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1977] RPC1; Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360; Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23 [2007] 1 WLR 1325; Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [2013] UKS…”
- Cited — JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov & Anor 2018-05-22
“…urthermore, not every detail of the relevant evidence need or can be captured in the reasons given by the judge. As Lord Hoffmann said in Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, 1372:…”