How many times has [1999] 1 WLR 1605 been cited?

[1999] 1 WLR 1605 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1999] 1 WLR 1605

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1999] 1 WLR 1605

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Applied · 1

Considered — Adele Lock v Paul Stanley (in his capacity as liquidator) & Anor. 2022-05-09
“…ther person aggrieved”. He referred to the decisions of this court in Re Edennote Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 389, of the Privy Council in Deloitte & Touche AG v Johnson [1999] 1 WLR 1605 and of this court in Brake v Lowes [2020] EWCA Civ 1491, [2021] PNLR 10, observing that it is not enough to consider whether an applicant is within the categor…”
Applied — Brake & Ors v Lowes & Ors 2020-11-13
“…In respect of the Brakes’ personal status as discharged bankrupts, applying the principles in Deloitte & Touche v AG Johnson [1999] 1 WLR 1605 and In re A Debtor (No 400 of 1940) The Debtor v Dodwell [1949] Ch 276the judge decided that, in the absence of fraud, a bankrupt may only challenge the decisi…”