- Cited — MARANELLO ROSSO LIMITED v LOHOMIJ BV 2022-12-21
“…ationship is sufficiently regulated by the express terms of the contract between them and by the applicable equitable principles. See Yorkshire Bank Plc v Hall [1999] 1 WLR 1713, per Robert Walker LJ at 1728; Morley v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc [2021] EWCA Civ 338, per Males LJ at [59]-[64]. The equitable principles applicable to Lohom…”
- Cited — Morley (t/a Morley Estates) v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc 2021-03-11
“…This analysis is well established. In Yorkshire Bank Plc v Hall [1999] 1 WLR 1713, after referring to what he described as “the well-known cases” of China & South Sea Bank Ltd v Tan Soon Gin [1990] 1 AC 536, Downsview Nominees Ltd v First Ci…”
- Cited — Morley (t/a Morley Estates) v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc 2021-03-11
“…, the imposition of such duties has nothing to do with the implication of terms in a contract under the general law of contracts: see Yorkshire Bank Plc v Hall [1999] 1 WLR 1713, 1728D. Whether these duties are imposed on a given party depends only on whether, on the true analysis of the transaction, it is or is not a mortgage.…”
- Cited — General Mediterranean Holding SA SPF v Qucomhaps Holdings Ltd & Ors 2018-10-31
“…There was reference to both Wulff v Jay and China & South Sea Bank v Tan in Yorkshire Bank plc v Hall [1999] 1 WLR 1713. There, a bank had made loans on the security of, among other things, shares that the borrowers held in a particular company. The borrowers complained that the…”