How many times has [2000] 1 WLR 2377 been cited?

[2000] 1 WLR 2377 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2000] 1 WLR 2377

· cited by 2 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2000] 1 WLR 2377

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Christopher Lovett v Wigan Borough Council 2022-12-16
“…In Hale v Tanner [2000] 1 WLR 2377 (Court of Appeal) Hale LJ (as she then was), with whom Swinton Thomas LJ and Sir Christopher Slade agreed, addressed contempt in the context of the Family Law …”
Cited — Business Mortgage Finance 4 Plc & Ors v Rizwan Hussain 2022-10-04
“…[2000] 1 WLR 2377 at 238 ; and (b) in view of cogent personal mitigation: see…”