How many times has [2001] 1 AC 518 been cited?

[2001] 1 AC 518 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2001] 1 AC 518

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2001] 1 AC 518

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Cited · 1

Considered — BV Nederlandse Industrie Van Eiprodukten v Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc. 2019-04-09
“…These different formulations were considered by the House of Lords in AlfredMcAlpine Construction Limited v Panatown Limited [2001] 1 AC 518. That was similarly a case about a defective building that had been sold on and the real issue, which was ultimately decisive of the appeal, was the existence …”
Cited — BV Nederlandse Industrie Van Eiprodukten v Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc. 2019-04-09
“…y party entitled to recover would be different from the only party which could be treated as suffering loss: see Alfred McAlpine ConstructionLtd v Panatown Ltd [2001] 1 AC 518, 547-548 (Lord Goff),…”