- Cited — Mohammed Adil v General Medical Council 2023-11-02
“…ngst the many cases of high authority establishing these principles are: Bolton v The Law Society [1994] 1 WLR at pp. 516, 518; Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915 at [34]; Preiss v General Dental Council [2001] 1 WLR 1926 at [27]; Marinovich v GMC [2002] UKPC 36 at [28]-[29]; Gupta v General Medical Council [2002] 1 WLR …”
- Cited — Sastry & Anor v General Medical Council 2021-04-30
“…Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915…”
- Cited — Sastry & Anor v General Medical Council 2021-04-30
“…“In Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915, 1923f-h the Board has recently emphasised that the powers are not as limited as may be suggested by some of the observations which have been made in the past.…”
- Cited — Sastry & Anor v General Medical Council 2021-04-30
“…e shape of the panel. That I think is reflected in the last citation I need give. It consists in Lord Millett’s observations in Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915 , 1923, para 34:…”
- Cited — Sastry & Anor v General Medical Council 2021-04-30
“…late powers to quash a committee's direction or to substitute a different direction is somewhat less inhibited than previously: Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915, para 34; (b) on an appeal against the sanction of removal, the question is whether it ‘was appropriate and necessary in the public interest or was excessive a…”
- Cited — Sastry & Anor v General Medical Council 2021-04-30
“…Millett observed in Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915, para 34, the appellate court ‘will accord an appropriate measure of respect to the judgment of the committee … But the [appellate court] will not defer to the…”
- Cited — General Medical Council v Chandra 2018-08-13
“…Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915…”
- Cited — General Medical Council v Chandra 2018-08-13
“…thall [2005] EWHC 579 (Admin); [2005] Lloyd's Rep Med 365 at paragraph 11, and Khan at paragraph 36(c). As Lord Millett observed in Ghosh v GMC [2001] UKPC 29; [2001] 1 WLR 1915 and 1923G, the appellate court "will afford an appropriate measure of respect of the judgment in the committee … but the [appellate court] will not defer to th…”
- Cited — The General Optical Council v Clarke 2018-06-25
“…dering an appeal from a disciplinary body, it can be important to bear in mind the body’s special expertise. In Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] UKPC 29, [2001] 1 WLR 1915, for instance, Lord Millett, giving the judgment of the Privy Council on an appeal from the Professional Conduct Committee of the General Medical Council, said…”
- Cited — Hussain v General Pharmaceutical Council (Rev 1) 2018-01-18
“…n appeal from a disciplinary body, it can be appropriate to bear in mind the body’s special expertise. Thus, in Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] UKPC 29, [2001] 1 WLR 1915, Lord Millett, giving the judgment of the Privy Council on an appeal from the Professional Conduct Committee of the General Medical Council, said (at paragraph…”
- Cited — Hussain v General Pharmaceutical Council (Rev 1) 2018-01-18
“…late powers to quash a committee’s direction or to substitute a different direction is somewhat less inhibited than previously: Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915, para 34; (b) on an appeal against the sanction of removal, the question is whether it ‘was appropriate and necessary in the public interest or was excessive a…”
- Cited — Hussain v General Pharmaceutical Council (Rev 1) 2018-01-18
“…v General Medical Council and Southall [2005] EWHC 579 (Admin) at [II], and Khan’s case at para 36. As Lord Millett observed in Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915, para 34, the appellate court ‘will accord an appropriate measure of respect to the judgment of the committee … But the [appellate court] will not defer to the…”
- Cited — Hussain v General Pharmaceutical Council (Rev 1) 2018-01-18
“…fessions Act 2002 and the fourth commencement order (SI 2003/833). As Mr Henderson noted, the Privy Council, shortly before, in Ghosh v General Medical Council [2001] 1 WLR 1915 and Preiss v General Dental Council [2001] 1 WLR 1926, had begun to distance itself from earlier expressions of deference to specialist regulatory and discipli…”