- Cited — SPM (R on the application of) v Secretary Of State For The Home Department 2023-07-04
“… mentioned in the preceding paragraph, we were also shown Raymond v Honey [1983] AC 1 and R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26, [2001] 2 AC 532).…”
- Cited — Kaitey (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-12-10
“… the HRA. He gave as examples R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p. Leech[1994] QB 198 and R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department[2001] 2 AC 532. He continued, at para. 119, that one can infer from these cases that, where Parliament authorises significant interferences with important legal rights, the c…”
- Cited — FB (Afghanistan) & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-10-21
“…t to access legal advice if, without such advice, access to justice would be compromised (R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26; [2001] 2 AC 532 at [5] per Lord Bingham of Cornhill; and MSS at [319]). For these rights to be effective, as the common law requires them to be, an individual must be allowed …”
- Cited — Michael, R (on the application of) v HMP Whitemoor & Anor 2020-01-23
“…Prisoners retain the right of access to the courts: R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532 per Lord Bingham of Cornhill at [5], but they have no unqualified right to attend court hearings in the same way as those at liberty. The statutory provision g…”
- Cited — Syed v The Secretary of State for Justice 2019-03-07
“…different to that of prisoners convicted of serious terrorist crimes. As the House of Lords made clear in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532…”
- Cited — Browne v The Parole Board of England & Wales 2018-09-20
“…est against a private interest) and the weight to be accorded to each such interest – see R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26, [2001] 2 AC 532, para 27, per Lord Steyn. However, it is important to emphasise that it is no part of the appellants' case that the court would thereby displace the relevant m…”
- Applied — Browne v The Parole Board of England & Wales 2018-09-20
“…nt result. This is important. A number of the authorities (such as R (Alconbury Developments Ltd v SoS for the Environment [2003] 2 AC 295, and R (Daly) v SSHD [2001] 2 AC 532) stress that there is often no great difference in the outcome whether the test applied is one of rationality or one of proportionality. One of the reasons why…”