- Cited — Colbalt Data Centre 2 LLP & Anor. The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-10-31
“…In Agnew v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2001] 2 AC 710 the question was whether an agreement amounted to a fixed or floating charge. Lord Millett said at [32]:…”
- Cited — Global 100 Limited v Maria Laleva 2021-12-03
“… and obligations are properly characterised as a licence or tenancy (as in Street v Mountford[1985] AC 809); or as a fixed or floating charge (as in Agnew v IRC[2001] 2 AC 710), or as a consumer hire agreement (as in TRM Copy Centres (UK) Ltd v Lanwall Services Ltd[2009] 1 WLR 1375). In all these cases the starting point is to identi…”
- Explained — The Mayor & Burgesses of the Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames v Moss 2020-10-27
“…In Agnew v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2001] 2 AC 710 the Privy Council considered whether an agreement created a fixed charge or a floating charge. Lord Millett explained:…”
- Cited — Candey Ltd v Crumpler & Anor 2020-01-23
“… fact that they wrongly thought that this would confer a fixed charge is to my mind irrelevant: see Agnew v Commissioners of the Inland Revenue [2001] UKPC 28, [2001] 2 AC 710, at para. 32 per Lord Millett. Secondly, in the situation posited in the Solland case there is no inconsistency between the new charge and the lien because the…”
- Cited — Uber B.V. ("UBV") & Ors v Aslam & Ors 2018-12-19
“…nd obligations are properly characterised as a licence or tenancy (as in Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809); or as a fixed or floating charge (as in Agnew v IRC [2001] 2 AC 710), or as a consumer hire agreement (as in TRM Copy Centres (UK) Ltd v Lanwall Services Ltd [2009] 1 WLR 1375). In all these cases the starting point is to ident…”