- Cited — Indran Murugason, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-11-16
“…[2001] AC 349, 396). Words and passages in a statute derive their meaning from their context. A phrase or passage must be read in the context of the section as a whole and i…”
- Cited — FSV Freeholders Limited v SGL 1 Limited 2023-11-14
“…meaning borne by the words in question in the particular context.” (R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Ex p Spath Holme Ltd [2001] AC 349, 396). Words and passages in a statute derive their meaning from their context. A phrase or passage must be read in the context of the section as a whole and i…”
- Cited — Commissioners for HMRC v Centrica Overseas Holdings Limited 2022-11-18
“…, by reference to the opinion of Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, ex parte Spath Holme Ltd [2001] AC 349, at 397, that there is an important constitutional reason for having regard primarily to the statutory context. This is because citizens, with the assistance o…”
- Cited — PSV 1982 Limited v Sean Anthony Edward Langdon 2022-10-12
“…meaning borne by the words in question in the particular context.” (R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Ex p Spath Holme Ltd [2001] AC 349, 396). Words and passages in a statute derive their meaning from their context. A phrase or passage must be read in the context of the section as a whole and i…”
- Considered — PSV 1982 Limited v Sean Anthony Edward Langdon 2022-10-12
“…hich a reasonable legislature as a body would be seeking to convey in using the statutory words which are being considered. Lord Nicholls, again in Spath Holme [2001] AC 349, 396, in an important passage stated:…”
- Cited — Rotala Plc (R on the application of) v Greater Manchester Combined Authority 2022-07-25
“…rd Hodge quoted two extracts from the speech of Lord Nicholls in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions ex parte Spath Holme Ltd [2001] AC 349 at p. 396. In the first, Lord Nicholls described statutory interpretation as “an exercise which requires the court to identify the meaning borne by the words i…”
- Cited — David Hyman & Anor. v The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-02-17
“…] UKSC 3 Lord Hodge, writing for the majority, said by reference to R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Ex p Spath Holme Ltd [2001] AC 349, that the object of statutory interpretation is to identify the meaning borne by the words of an Act of Parliament, in its statutory context; and that citizens…”