How many times has [2001] STC 103 been cited?

[2001] STC 103 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2001] STC 103

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2001] STC 103

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Revenue And Customs v Fortyseven Park Street Ltd 2019-05-17
“… to exclude any other person from enjoyment of such a right” (Temco, at paragraph 19 of the judgment; also Case C-150/99 Swedish State v Stockholm Lindöpark AB [2001] STC 103, [2001] ECR I-493, at paragraph 38 of the Advocate General’s opinion; Sinclair Collis, at paragraph 25 of the judgment;…”
Cited — Revenue And Customs v Fortyseven Park Street Ltd 2019-05-17
“…ision of a service rather than simply the making available of property, such as the right to use a golf course (Sweden v Stockholm Lindöpark AB (Case C-150/99) [2001] STC 103, [2001] ECR I-493, paras 24 to 27), the right to use a bridge in consideration of payment of a toll (EC Commission v Ireland (Case C-358/97) [2000] ECR I-6301)…”