How many times has [2002] 1 AC 301 been cited?

[2002] 1 AC 301 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] 1 AC 301

· cited by 3 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2002] 1 AC 301

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Shellett Rowe v London Borough of Haringey 2022-10-21
“…[2001] UKHL 43, [2002] 1 AC 301 (“…”
Cited — Aldford House Freehold Ltd v Grosvenor (Mayfair) Estate & Anor 2019-11-01
“…es may be a “dwelling” (or even be used for the purposes of a dwelling) even though they lack cooking facilities: Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins[2001] UKHL 43, [2002] 1 AC 301. But there may well be cases in which it is difficult to decide whether a set of premises has reached the stage at which it is suitable for use as a dwelling. …”
Cited — The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Hockley & Anor 2019-06-24
“…The decision of the House of Lords in Utratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] 1 AC 301 which was relied on by the Secretary of State is an example of this well established approach.…”