“… against the Defendants, directing himself that his order must be fair and reasonable in that respect (to borrow the language of May LJ in Reid Minty v. Taylor [2002] 1 WLR 2800 at para [20]). The first was that he had had much to criticise in his main judgment about the evidence and methods of business of the claimant Ben himself. The…”
“…The general principles relating to indemnity costs can be found in the well-known authorities of Petrotrade v Texaco [2002] 1 WLR 947; Reid Minty v Taylor [2002] 1 WLR 2800; Kiam v MGM (2) [2002] 1 WLR 2810 and Excelsior Commercial and Industrial Holdings Ltd v Salisbury Hammer Aspden and Johnson [2002] CP Rep 67. More recent auth…”