- Cited — Elo Trustees Limited v Bonhams 1793 Limited & Anor 2023-06-14
“…e of the Claim Form would not have made any difference to the deemed date of service: see CPR rule 6.14, Godwin v Swindon Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1478, [2002] 1 WLR 997 and Anderton v Clywd County Council [2002] EWCA Civ 933, [2002] 1 WLR 3174. (By contrast, as is also common ground, personal service would have made a differen…”
- Cited — Jerry Isah, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-03-14
“…e observations of Hale LJ in In re C (Legal Aid: Preparation of Bill of Costs) [2001] 1 FLR 602 at 608-9 para 21 and May LJ in Godwin v Swindon Borough Council [2002] 1 WLR 997 at 1001, para 11, in relation to the role of Practice Directions. Hale LJ had observed that practice directions are not made by statutory instrument, are not l…”
- Cited — AKC v Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust 2022-05-10
“…uthoritatively delineated by Hale LJ in In re C (Legal Aid: Preparation of Bill of Costs) [2001] 1 FLR 602, para 21, May LJ in Godwin v Swindon Borough Council [2002] 1 WLR 997, para 11, and Dyson LJ in Leigh v Michelin Tyre plc [2004] 1 WLR 846, paras 19-21. It is sufficient for present purposes to say that a practice direction has n…”
- Cited — Diriye v Bojaj & Anor 2020-10-15
“… and the way in which it effectively overrides actual service in the scheme of the CPR, can be seen from Godwin v Swindon Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1478, [2002] 1 WLR 997. In that case, the claim form was served by First class post on 7 September 2000. The relevant order specified that it must be served by 8 September 2000, whic…”
- Cited — King v City of London Corporation 2019-12-18
“…[2002] 1 WLR 997 at paragraph 11, “at best a weak aid to the interpretation of the rules themselves”. In U v Liverpool City Council [2005] EWCA Civ 475, [2005] 1 WLR 2657, Broo…”
- Cited — Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland 2019-04-16
“…We were first referred to two decisions of the Court of Appeal. The first was Godwin v Swindon Borough Council [2002] 1 WLR 997 (Pill, May LJJ and Rimer J). The second was Anderton v Clwyd County Council (No. 2) [2002] 1 WLR 3174 (Lord Phillips MR, Mummery and Hale LJJ). Mr Glen submitt…”
- Cited — Société Générale v Goldas Kuyumculuk Sanayi Ithalat Ihracat A.S. & Ors 2018-05-15
“…In Godwin v Swindon Borough Council [2002] 1 WLR 997 May LJ at para 50 made the point that the rule dispensing with service (now CPR 6.16) cannot extend to extricate a claimant from the consequences of late servi…”