How many times has (2002) 34 EHRR 2 been cited?

(2002) 34 EHRR 2 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

(2002) 34 EHRR 2

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

(2002) 34 EHRR 2

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v FWF & Anor, R (On the Application Of) 2021-01-28
“… to trigger the duty to investigate. The TCRs should not have been refused. The substantive breach was the failure to ‘reunify’ (see TP and KM v United Kingdom (2002) 34 EHRR 2 at paragraph 83).…”
Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v FTH, R. (On the Application of) (Rev 1) 2020-04-06
“…although a breach of those rights can be effected by a failure to adopt a fair procedure: see, e.g., TP and KM v United Kingdom (ECtHR Application No 28945/95) (2002) 34 EHRR 2 at [83]; and P, C and S v United Kingdom (ECtHR Application No 56547/00) (2002) 35 EHRR 31 at [136]-[137]).…”