How many times has (2002) 34 EHRR 3 been cited?

(2002) 34 EHRR 3 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

(2002) 34 EHRR 3

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

(2002) 34 EHRR 3

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — UK P&I Club NV v República Bolivariana De Venezuela 2023-12-20
“…mate aim, and (c) is proportionate to achieving that legitimate aim (see Ashingdane v. United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 528 at [57], Z and others v. United Kingdom (2002) 34 EHRR 3 at [93], Alassini v. Telecom Italia SpA (Joined Cases C-317/08, C-301/08, C-319/08 and C-320/08) [2010] 3 CMLR 17 at [63], and Churchill v. Merthyr Tydfil [202…”
Cited — James Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council 2023-11-29
“…Z and others v. United Kingdom (2002) 34 EHRR 3 (Z and others)…”
Cited — AG (A Child), Re 2022-11-18
“…a systems duty on the state to take effective measures to prevent private acts of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In Z v. United Kingdom (2002) 34 EHRR 3, the ECtHR said at [73] that article 3 enshrined “one of the most fundamental values of democratic society”, and that “[t]hese measures should provide effectiv…”