How many times has [2002] Ch 1 been cited?

[2002] Ch 1 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] Ch 1

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2002] Ch 1

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Distinguished · 1

Distinguished — The Official Receiver v Shop Direct Finance Company Limited 2023-04-05
“…In Dear v Reeves [2001] EWCA Civ 277; [2002] Ch 1, at para. 40, Mummery LJ said that a distinguishing feature of a right of property, in contrast to a purely personal right, is that it is “transferable: it may…”
Cited — Gwinnutt v George & Anor 2019-04-12
“… Jones [2001] EWCA Civ 779, [2001] Pens LR 217, at paragraph 39, per Mummery LJ). In a similar vein, Mummery LJ had noted in Dear v Reeves [2001] EWCA Civ 277, [2002] Ch 1 a couple of months earlier (at paragraph 39):…”