How many times has [2003] 1 AC 384 been cited?

[2003] 1 AC 384 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] 1 AC 384

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2003] 1 AC 384

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter 2021-03-11
“…[2002] UKHL 18, [2003] 1 AC 384 (‘…”
Cited — Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter 2021-03-11
“…This was the view of Lord Scott in Cave v Robinson Jarvis & Rolf [2002] UKHL 18, [2003] 1 AC 384. He concluded his analysis of the terms of section 32(1)(b) and 32(2) by rejecting any elaboration of their language such as the addition of a requirement that…”