- Cited — Bridges, R (On the Application Of) v South Wales Police 2020-08-11
“…ks whether there has been a violation of an applicant’s rights on the particular facts of the case before it. As Lord Bingham of Cornhill said in Brown v Stott [2003] 1 AC 681, at 704:…”
- Cited — McKay v The All England Lawn Tennis Club (Championships) Ltd & Ors 2020-06-02
“…ring to the decisions of the Grand Chamber of the Strasbourg court in O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2007) 46 EHRR 397 and of the House of Lords in Brown v Stott [2003] 1 AC 681, upholding the validity of section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required the registered owner of a vehicle to identify the driver to the police.…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v JS (Uganda) 2019-10-10
“…clude and on which they were able to agree, omitting other terms which they did not wish to include or were unable to agree (per Lord Bingham in Brown v. Stott [2003] 1 AC 681, 703E).…”
- Cited — A & Anor. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority & Anor. 2018-07-03
“…ittlewoods, supra, loc. cit), let alone by any factor connected to their trafficking. On no view was the very essence of the right impaired (cf., Brown v Stott [2003] 1 AC 681, at p.695). Neither the principle of effectiveness, nor for that matter, purposive interpretation can confer additional rights on the Appellants, not granted b…”