How many times has [2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 61 been cited?

[2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 61 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 61

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — ABN Amro Bank N.V. v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc & Ors. 2021-12-02
“… MIA 1906. The NAC needed to refer expressly to an estoppel if it were to be effective, since, as Lord Bingham had said in HIH Casualty v. Chase Manhattan Bank [2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 61 at [11]: “the courts should not ordinarily infer that a contracting party has given up rights that the law has conferred upon him to an extent greater than the…”
Cited — First Tower Trustees Ltd & Anor v CDS (Superstores International) Ltd 2018-06-19
“…uld be entitled at common law, it must do so clearly. To quote but one example, in HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank [2003] UKHL 6, [2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 61 Lord Bingham said:…”