- Cited — City of London Police v Geldart 2021-04-28
“…ingle question. The locus classicus is paras. 7-11 of the speech of Lord Nicholls in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11, [2003] ICR 337. At para. 8, having identified those two questions, he says:…”
- Cited — Page v NHS Trust Development Authority 2021-02-26
“…of: see the very well-known passage at paras. 8-13 of the speech of Lord Nicholls in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11, [2003] ICR 337. Aylott says nothing to the contrary. In any event, even if the Tribunal had undertaken the exercise the correct comparator would not have been as Mr Diamond p…”
- Cited — Tabidi v British Broadcasting Corporation 2020-06-11
“…ion which are particularly relevant for our purposes emerge from the leading case of Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11, [2003] ICR 337:…”
- Approved — Jesudason v Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust 2020-01-31
“… [2001] ICR 1065, para 53. More recently it has been cited with approved in your Lordships' House in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] ICR 337. At para 35, my noble and learned friend, Lord Hope of Craighead, after referring to the observation and describing the test as being one of “materiality”, als…”
- Cited — Base Childrenswear Ltd v Otshudi 2019-10-09
“…son LJ at para. 43 (p. 129); and also, to similar effect, Lord Rodger’s statement in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11, [2003] ICR 337, that “a tribunal cannot draw inferences from thin air” – see para. 144 (p. 384D). He submitted that there was nothing in the facts found here which could just…”
- Followed — Chief Constable of Norfolk v Coffey 2019-06-21
“… follow. That point was first and most authoritatively made by the House of Lords in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11, [2003] ICR 337, (see in particular per Lord Nicholls at paras. 11-12 (p. 342 B-D)); and in fact Mr Feeny told us that in his submissions to the ET he reminded it of Shamoon. …”
- Cited — Ali v Capita Customer Management Ltd (Rev 2) 2019-05-24
“…fference between the circumstances relating to each case. Ms Omambala referred us to Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11, [2003] ICR 337, Lockwood v Department of Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1195 [2014] 1 All ER 250 and R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40, [2017] 1 WLR…”
- Cited — Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi 2019-01-23
“…well established that the reason must be that of the actual decision maker: see e.g. Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11; [2003] ICR 337 para. 7 per Lord Nicholls. I see force in the claimant’s argument that had there been sufficient facts to enable the claimant to discharge the burden at the fi…”
- Cited — Mruke v Khan 2018-02-23
“…Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11; [2003] ICR 337.…”