How many times has [2003] QB 1175 been cited?

[2003] QB 1175 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] QB 1175

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2003] QB 1175

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Glover v Barker & Ors 2020-08-21
“…(No 2) [2003] QB 1175, 1194 as ‘those with no personal interest in the litigation, who do not stand to benefit from it, are not funding it as a matter of business, and in no way see…”
Cited — Chapelgate Credit Opportunity Master Fund Ltd v Money & Ors 2020-02-25
“… an order, some against. (2) Generally speaking the discretion will not be exercised against ‘pure funders’, described in para 40 of Hamilton v Al Fayed (No 2) [2003] QB 1175, 1194 as ‘those with no personal interest in the litigation, who do not stand to benefit from it, are not funding it as a matter of business, and in no way see…”