How many times has [2004] 1 AC 260 been cited?

[2004] 1 AC 260 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2004] 1 AC 260

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2004] 1 AC 260

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Explained · 1

Cited — SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd 2020-05-12
“…Kwok Chi Leung Karl v Commissioner of Estate Duty [1988] 1 WLR 1035, 1040-1041; Société Eram Shipping Co Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation [2003] UKHL 30, [2004] 1 AC 260, paragraph 72; Hillside (New Media) Ltd v Baasland [2010] EWHC 3336 (Comm), [2010] 2 CLC 986, paragraph 33; Taurus Petroleum Ltd v State Oil Marketing Co of th…”
Explained — SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd 2020-05-12
“…e an interference with the sovereignty of State B. As Lord Hoffman explained in Société Eram Shipping Co Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation [2003] UKHL 30, [2004] 1 AC 260:…”