- Cited — FXJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor 2023-11-20
“…e questions identified as relevant to determining an article 8 claim by Lord Bingham in R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27, [2004] 2 AC 368, but said they had to be set in context, and “did not need to be determined in that format” in this case. The claim as pleaded was directed only at delay in gr…”
- Cited — R3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-02-17
“… was not sufficiently foreseeable (Gillan). The decision is therefore not “in accordance with the law” (R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 2 AC 368) and the appeal falls to be allowed (Charles (human rights appeal: scope) [2018] UKUT 89 (IAC))’. In his skeleton argument in support of the application to var…”
- Followed — Heidi Crowter and Anor, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 2022-11-25
“…[2004] UKHL 27, [2004] 2 AC 368. In the present case the Divisional Court, following (we were told) the approach of the parties, proceeded directly to the question of interference. The implic…”
- Applied — Runa v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-04-08
“…Article 8 grounds, the DUTJ applied the approach set out by Lord Bingham of Cornhill in R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27; [2004] 2 AC 368. It was held that Article 8 was engaged and the DUTJ moved to consider whether the interference was in accordance with the law and necessary to protect the eco…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v PF (Nigeria) 2019-07-04
“…n considerations are likely to prevail over legitimate aims of immigration control (see R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27; [2004] 2 AC 368 at [59] per Baroness Hale).…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v JG (Jamaica) 2019-06-12
“…rticle 8 apart from the Rules and the statute, referring to the well-known approach in R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2004] UKHL 27, [2004] 2 AC 368.…”
- Cited — Balajigari v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-04-16
“…[2004] UKHL 27, [2004] 2 AC 368, at para. 17 of the opinion of Lord Bingham (p. 389)).…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v AB (Jamaica) & Anor 2019-04-12
“…In R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27;[2004] 2 AC 368, at para. 17, Lord Bingham of Cornhill set out the questions that arise for determination when removal is resisted in reliance on Article 8 grounds:…”
- Cited — TZ (Pakistan) and PG (India) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-17
“… on the state to permit the applicant to remain in the UK. The framework or approach in R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27, [2004] 2 AC 368 at [17]is not to be taken to avoid the need to undertake this critical balance.…”
- Cited — Onwuje & Anor v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-03-01
“… goes on to refer briefly to the burden of proof and (though in rather opaque terms) to R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27, [2004] 2 AC 368,and the subsequent decision of theUpper Tribunal in Omotunde v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKUT 00247 (IAC). At para. 36 he says:…”
- Cited — Rahman v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-02-13
“…The Appellant relies on a number of authorities, including Razgar v SSHD [2004] 2 AC 368and Samir v SSHD (2016) EWCA Civ 82.…”