How many times has [2004] PNLR 1 been cited?

[2004] PNLR 1 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2004] PNLR 1

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2004] PNLR 1

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Spire Property Development LLP & Anor. v Withers LLP 2022-07-19
“… Prior [2011] EWHC 711 (QB) (“Investors Friend”); Crossnan v Ward Bracewell & Co [1984] PN 103 (“Crossnan”); Cade v Cade 71 SASR 571 (“Cade”); Campbell v Imray [2004] PNLR 1 (“Campbell”); Shepherd v Byrne and Partners LLP [2017] EWHC Ch; Lloyd’s Rep FC 8 (“Shepherd”). These authorities fall into two categories: those involving the …”
Cited — Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey (a firm) 2018-06-06
“…We were also referred in this context to Campbell (or Pearson) v Imray [2004] PNLR 1 where Lord Emslie in the Court of Session expressed strong disagreement with views of Swinton Thomas LJ, stating that it was not legitimate to take into accoun…”