How many times has [2004] RPC 46 been cited?

[2004] RPC 46 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2004] RPC 46

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2004] RPC 46

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — E Mishan & Sons, Inc v Hozelock Ltd & Ors 2020-07-08
“…First, he submitted that the judge had lost sight of the importance of the factor identified by Jacob LJ in Technip France SA’s Patent [2004] EWCA Civ 384, [2004] RPC 46 at [122]:…”
Cited — Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor 2018-03-28
“…in context. The judge made it clear that he had this principle well in mind at [149] of his judgment. He cited what Jacob LJ said in Technip France SA’s Patent [2004] RPC 46:…”