How many times has [2005] 1 WLR 1184 been cited?

[2005] 1 WLR 1184 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] 1 WLR 1184

· cited by 3 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2005] 1 WLR 1184

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — RD, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors 2020-10-20
“… cautions under section 66ZA. Warnings and reprimands were not a penal procedure. As Lord Bingham put it in relation to warnings in R (R) v Durham Constabulary [2005] 1 WLR 1184 (HL), although they required the offender to have admitted the offence, they constituted a ‘preventative, curative, rehabilitative or welfare-promoting’ dispos…”
Cited — RD, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors 2020-10-20
“… cautions under section 66ZA. Warnings and reprimands were not a penal procedure. As Lord Bingham put it in relation to warnings in R (R) v Durham Constabulary [2005] 1 WLR 1184 (HL), although they required the offender to have admitted the offence, they constituted a ‘preventative, curative, rehabilitative or welfare-promoting’ dispos…”
Cited — AB, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice 2019-01-18
“…Further, the UNCRC mustbe taken into account when interpreting ECHR rights applicable to children, per Lady Hale in R (R) v Durham Constabulary [2005] UKHL 21; [2005] 1 WLR 1184, at…”