- Applied — Turani & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-03-15
“…es) or when exercising a public function. As Baroness Hale explained in R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport [2004] UKHL 55, [2005] 2 AC 1 at [76] (“Roma Rights”) the prohibition against unlawful discrimination has always applied to public authority providers of employment, education and housing, …”
- Cited — FB (Afghanistan) & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-10-21
“…ministrative scheme is systemically defective are well-known (see, e.g., R (European Roma Rights Centre) v ImmigrationOfficer at Prague Airport [2004] UKHL 55; [2005] 2 AC 1 at 91] per Baroness Hale; and R (Howard League for Penal Reform) v Lord Chancellor [2017] EWCA Civ 244; [2017] 4 WLR 92 at [53] per Beatson LJ giving the judgm…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor v RH 2020-07-29
“…res, because, as Lord Steyn put it in R (European RomaRights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport (UnitedNations High Comr for Refugees intervening) [2005] 2 AC 1, para 41: It is necessarily implicit in section 2 that no administrative practice or procedure may be adopted which would be contrary to the Convention. But to…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants 2020-04-21
“…ementing a statutory scheme as private citizens (cf cases such as DH and R (European Roma RightsCentre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport [2004] UKHL 55; [2005] 2 AC 1, in which officers of the state operated a statutory scheme in a discriminatory manner). Whilst, speaking for myself, I am prepared to accept that a statutory …”
- Cited — Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) 2020-01-20
“… has been agreed or which seeks to rewrite the Agreement: see per Lord Bingham of Cornhill at [19] of R v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport [2004] UKHL 55; [2005] 2 AC 1, albeit in the context of the interpretation of international treaties in good faith. Likewise, the UNIDROIT principles, upon which Mr Tse placed so much relia…”
- Cited — JSC Commercial Bank Privatbank v Kolomoisky & Ors 2019-10-15
“…tation of an international treaty stated by Lord Bingham of Cornhill in R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport [2004] UKHL 55, [2005] 2 AC 1 at [18]-[19], specifically the passage at [18]:…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v JS (Uganda) 2019-10-10
“…[2005] 2 AC 1, Lord Bingham said (at [18]):…”
- Cited — BF (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-05-23
“…udgment that failure to monitor a policy can constitute unlawfulness: see the remarks of Baroness Hale in R (European Roma Rights) v Prague Immigration Officer [2005] 2 AC 1 62 [91]). I have also observed that whilst the respondent has taken some steps to monitor this policy, she had done so belatedly and largely as a result of dir…”
- Considered — AB, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-03-06
“…In R (European Roma Rights) v Prague Immigration Officer [2004] UKHL 55, [2005] 2 AC 1, the House of Lords held that the Refugee Convention does not require the UK to consider claims for asylum made by persons outside the UK. Lord Bingham (with w…”
- Cited — RSM (A Child), R. (On the Application of v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-18
“…[2005] 2 AC 1 (at [15] to [18] per Lord Bingham with whom Lord Hope, Lady Hale and Lord Carswell agreed), the House of Lords held that the expression “refugee” had to be und…”