How many times has [2005] STC 1547 been cited?

[2005] STC 1547 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] STC 1547

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2005] STC 1547

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Applied · 1

Applied — Eynsham Cricket Club v Revenue & Customs 2021-02-23
“…ad-Stockham submitted that the UT failed properly to apply the principle established by the CJEU in Kingscrest Associates and Montecello v CCE (Case C- 498/03) [2005] STC 1547 that the domestic classification of an entity as a “charity” is not relevant to the application of the principle of equal treatment. What matters is the substa…”
Cited — The Commissioners for HMRC v University of Cambridge 2018-03-27
“…ch are thus in competition with each other, differently for VAT purposes (see, inter alia, Kingscrest Associates Ltd v Customs and Excise Comrs (Case C-498/03) [2005] STC 1547, [2005] ECR I-4427, para 41; Turn- und Sportunion Waldburg v Finanzlandesdirektion für Oberösterreich (Case C-246/04) [2006] STC 1506, [2006] ECR I-589, para 3…”