- Cited — SWP, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-04-25
“…ue of justification, I regard as salutary what was said by Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead in R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37; [2006] 1 AC 173, at para. 3:…”
- Cited — Drexler, R (On the Application Of) v Leicestershire County Council 2020-04-07
“…y be required to justify what would otherwise be discrimination on such grounds: see e.g. R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37; [2006] 1 AC 173, at paras. 15-17 in the opinion of Lord Hoffmann; and paras. 55-60 in the opinion of Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe. Lord…”
- Cited — AR & SXC, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2020-01-29
“…lations was unsuccessful and her eventual appeal to the House of Lords was dismissed: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37; [2006] 1 AC 173.…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37; [2006] 1 AC 173 and R (A) v Secretary of State for Health (Alliance for Choice and other intervening) [2017] UKSC 41; [2017] 1 WLR 2492), “homelessness” (see R (RJM) v Secreta…”
- Cited — Worley v The Secretary of State for Works And Pensions 2019-01-30
“… to be taken. In Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557 at [134] Baroness Hale said that a “rigidly formulaic approach is to be avoided”. In R (Carson) v SSWP [2006] 1 AC 173 at [3] Lord Nicholls said that “The essential question is whether the alleged discrimination, that is, the difference in treatment of which complaint is made, …”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…he Supreme Court as falling within the scope of article 14 include place of residence (see R (Carson) vSecretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37; [2006] 1 AC 173 and R (A) v Secretary of State for Health (Alliance for Choice and other intervening) [2017] UKSC 41; [2017] 1 WLR 2492), “homelessness” (see the RJM case), a …”