- Cited — The Reverend Paul Williamson v The Bishop of London & Ors 2023-04-05
“…[2006] 1 AC 340, paragraph 23. To answer this question a broader inquiry is called for.…”
- Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…We invited counsel to comment on the relevance, if any, of R v Soneji [2005] UKHL 49, [2006] 1 AC 340 (“Soneji”) and subsequent cases such as Natt v Osman [2014] EWCA Civ 1520, [2015] 1 WLR 1536 and Elim Court v Avon Freeholds [2017] EWCA Civ 89, [2018] QB 571.…”
- Applied — Naresh Kumar Marepally v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-06-24
“…graph (3) in those cases where, initially, paragraph (3) need not be complied with. Against this statutory background, applying Lord Steyn's approach in Soneji [2006] 1 AC 340 (see para 21 above), I consider that Parliament would have intended that a failure in a notice of decision to comply with the requirement to advise an claimant…”
- Cited — GR Property Management Ltd v Safdar & Ors 2020-11-03
“… of non-compliance, and posing the question whether Parliament can fairly be taken to have intended total invalidity in the event of non-compliance: R v Soneji [2006] 1 AC 340; Natt v Osman [2014] EWCA Civ 1520, [2015] 1 WLR 1536.…”
- Cited — GR Property Management Ltd v Safdar & Ors 2020-11-03
“…ess of 72 hours from the time of the order”. That consequence cannot be avoided by relying, as the courts below sought to do, on such authorities as R v Soneji [2006] 1 AC 340. Those authorities were concerned with situations where the legislation was silent as to the consequences of failure to comply with a time limit, and where the…”
- Cited — Haworth, R (On the Application Of) v Revenue And Customs 2019-05-01
“…“directory” requirement need not do so. However, in R v Soneji [2006] 1 AC 340 Lord Steyn said (at paragraph 23) that “the rigid mandatory and directory distinction, and its many artificial refinements, have outlived their usefulness”. In…”
- Cited — Ndole Assets Ltd v Designer M&E Services UK Ltd 2018-12-21
“…equences of a breach of a statutory provision are, in the ordinary way, to be found in the scheme and terms of the statute itself: see, for example, R v Soneji [2006] 1 AC 340. In the present case, our attention was not drawn to any statutory provision in the 2007 Act stipulating the consequence (in terms of validity) for an act of c…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v SM (Rwanda) 2018-12-11
“…In R v Soneji [2006] 1 AC 340, a case concerning a failure to comply with time limits in confiscation proceedings, Lord Steyn echoed Lord Hailsham's dictum (at paragraph [15]):…”