How many times has [2006] 1 FLR 1186 been cited?

[2006] 1 FLR 1186 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2006] 1 FLR 1186

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2006] 1 FLR 1186

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Considered · 1

Considered — XW v XH 2019-12-18
“…sue leads to an award which, to quote Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 2 AC 618, [2006] 2 WLR 1283, [2006] 1 FLR 1186, at para [27], the judge considers gives 'to the contribution made by one party's non-matrimonial property the weight he considers just … with such generality …”
Cited — Martin v Martin (Rev 1) 2018-12-21
“…[2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 1 FLR 1186…”
Cited — Versteegh v Versteegh 2018-05-10
“…the fact that the vulnerability of valuations had been specifically recognised by the House of Lords in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane: [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 1 FLR 1186. Moylan LJ said:…”