- Applied — U3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-07-14
“…ial review do not apply’; SIAC should have adopted the approach described by Lord Bingham in paragraph 16 of Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167, which includes establishing the relevant facts.…”
- Cited — Re A (Parental Responsibility) 2023-06-16
“…[2007] UKHL 11, [2007] 2 AC 167,…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v SA (Jamaica) 2018-12-21
“…rily involve any circumstance which is exceptional in the sense of being extraordinary (as counsel for the Secretary of State accepted, consistently with Huang [2007] 2 AC 167,para 20), but they can be said to involve “exceptional circumstances” in the sense that they involve a departure from the general rule.…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v MR (Pakistan) 2018-07-12
“…mittee delivered by Lord Bingham in the context of immigration cases involving Article 8, in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 11; [2007] 2 AC 167. Of particular relevance in this case, is that appellate decision making is not governed by the Immigration Rules but that the Rules are nevertheless relevant …”
- Cited — Ribeli v Entry Clearance Officer, Pretoria 2018-03-27
“… for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60; [2016] 1 WLR 4799, para. 44 (Lord Reed JSC), citing Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 11; [2007] 2 AC 167, para. 16 (Lord Bingham of Cornhill); and also paras. 46 and 50; and R (Agyarko) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 11; [2017] 1 WLR 823,…”
- Disapproved — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v MS (Pakistan) 2018-03-23
“…hether the decision-maker had acted irrationally or misdirected himself. This was clear from Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 11; [2007] 2 AC 167 where the House of Lords disapproved earlier appellate authority such as Edore v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 716; [2003] 1 WLR 2…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v Olarewaju 2018-03-21
“…lve any circumstance which is exceptional in the sense of being extraordinary (as counsel for the Secretary of State accepted, consistently with the Huang case [2007] 2 AC 167, para 20), but they can be said to involve ‘exceptional circumstances’ in the sense that they involve a departure from the general rule.”…”