- Cited — Shields-MckInley v The Secretary of State for Justice the Lord Chancellor & Anor 2019-11-14
“…See further, Mooren v Germany (2010) 50 EHRR 23 at paras 74 to 79, Saadi v United Kingdom (2008) 47 EHRR 17 at paras 68 to 71; R (Bayliss) v Parole Board [2014] EWCA Civ 1631, at 29 to 37, where Sir Brian Leveson P. reviewed the principles of the lawfulness of detent…”
- Cited — Hameed & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-03-18
“…eded to be in place and to be observed: see R (Saadi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKHL 41, [2002] 1 WLR 3131 and Saadi v United Kingdom (2008) 47 EHRR 17.…”
- Cited — Hemmati & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-10-04
“… due course. The detention of an individual for these purposes was found to be lawful and compatible with Article 5(1)(f) of the ECHR in Saadi v United Kingdom (2008) 47 EHRR 17. At this initial stage, it will not be known whether the individual might be removed pursuant to the Dublin III arrangements and Article 28 has no application.…”
- Cited — Faulkner, R (on the application of) v Director of Legal Aid Casework 2018-07-19
“…ll be awarded even if they impinge upon non-pecuniary damages awarded is wrong. That is clear from Scordino itself and for example, from Saadi v United Kingdom (2008) 47 EHRR 17, a case which was concerned with a breach of Article 5(2). An award of €5,000 compensation for non-pecuniary damage was upheld and a total award of €3,000 cost…”