How many times has [2008] STC 2626 been cited?

[2008] STC 2626 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2008] STC 2626

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2008] STC 2626

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Tower Bridge GP Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-07-18
“…In Ecotrade SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate (Joined Cases C-95/07 and C-96/07), [2008] STC 2626 the taxable person made a mistake about the operation of the reverse charge procedure. It registered the supplies in question as exempt. The net effect of the …”
Cited — Hammonds of Knutsford Plc, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs 2018-02-08
“…egională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, at paragraph 35 of the judgment; see also e.g. Joined Cases C-95/07 and C-96/07 Ecotrade SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate [2008] STC 2626, at paragraph 66 of the judgment, and Case C-272/13 Equoland Soc coop arl v Agenzia delle Dogane [2014] STC 2487, at paragraph 41 of the judgment);…”