- Cited — Peiris, R (on the application of) v First-Tier Tribunal & Ors 2023-12-21
“…[2009] 1 AC 311, para 56…”
- Cited — Daniel Richard Jwanczuk v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2023-10-11
“…[2008] UKHL 63, [2009] 1 AC 311,…”
- Cited — The Motherhood Plan (R on the application of) v HM Treasury 2021-11-24
“…e that the bar to a challenge to an instrument of social and economic policy is a high one: R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, [2008] UKHL 63, [2009] 1 AC 311 per Lord Neuberger at paras. 54-57. Determining the scope of instruments of welfare provision is primarily the responsibility of the executive and legislature.…”
- Cited — Solaria Energy UK Ltd v Department for Business, Energy And Industrial Strategy 2020-11-04
“…Although not directly in point, mention should also be made of R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311, where it was held that a disability premium fell within the ambit of A1P1, despite the fact that it was only of value to the person who was claiming the premi…”
- Cited — AR & SXC, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2020-01-29
“…g or what is being done to him.” Nevertheless, Lord Wilson observed that, by its decision in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63; [2009] 1 AC 311, namely that the appellant’s homelessness was a relevant status, the House of Lords had demonstrated that the prohibited grounds extend well beyond “innate cha…”
- Cited — Simawi v London Borough of Haringey 2019-10-31
“…In R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63, [2009] 1 AC 311 at [45] Lord Neuberger said that it was not necessary for those characteristics to be immutable; but in general one should concentrate on what somebody is, rat…”
- Followed — Langford v The Secretary of State for Defence 2019-07-17
“…of Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe (with whom the rest of the Appeal Committee agreed) in the House of Lords in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311 at 318H – 319D, paragraph 5, as follows:…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…83; Vrontou v Cyprus (2017) 65 EHRR 31, paras 62-64. It was adopted by the House of Lords in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63; [2009] 1 AC 311 and has since been treated as part of UK law.…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…[2008] UKHL 63; [2009] 1 AC 311), a person’s immigration status (see R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57; [2015] 1 WLR 3820), and being a co-hab…”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…9; Stummer v Austria (2012) 54 EHRR 11, paras 81-83. It was adopted by the House of Lords in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63; [2009] 1 AC 311. No case was cited to us in which it has since been contested or questioned in a UK court.…”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…work of its social security legislation. I do not read the observations of Lord Neuberger in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63; [2009] 1 AC 311, para 32, on which Mr Collins relied, as in any way inconsistent with this interpretation.…”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…So, for example, as Lord Neuberger noted in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63; [2009] 1 AC 311, para 43, military rank, residence or domicile and previous employment with the KGB have all been held by the European Court of Human Rights to fall within “ot…”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…In the RJM case [2009] 1 AC 311, para 5, Lord Walker depicted the grounds covered by article 14 as falling within a series of concentric circles, with those characteristics which are innate o…”
- Considered — A & Anor. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority & Anor. 2018-07-03
“…In R (RJM) v Work and Pensions Secretary [2008] UKHL 63; [2009] 1 AC 311, the Supreme Court considered the cessation of payment of a disability premium to those who had become homeless. The observations of Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbu…”
- Disapproved — WB v W District Council 2018-04-26
“…ke Lloyd LJ) they took the view that the exclusion was compatible with Convention rights. In R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63, [2009] 1 AC 311 at [64] to [67] Lord Neuberger referred to Denousse with apparent approval (and certainly did not disapprove of the approach that this court had taken to the i…”