- Explained — Friends of the Earth Limited, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for International Trade/UK Export Finance (UKEF) & Anor 2023-01-13
“…ebilene were explained by Lord Bingham (with whom Lords Hoffmann, Rodger and Brown agreed) in R (Corner House Research) v. Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756 (Corner House) at [44]:…”
- Cited — Heathrow Airport Ltd & Ors v Her Majesty's Treasury (Rev 1) 2021-05-21
“…In R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2009] 1 AC 756 (“Corner House”) the House of Lords accepted that provisions of unincorporated treaties were justiciable when they formed part of the thinking of the decision …”
- Cited — End Violence Against Women Coalition, R (On the Application Of) v Director of Public Prosecutions 2021-03-15
“…a court of review generally approaches a decision of the DPP or CPS (see e.g. R (Corner House Research) v. Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60; [2009] 1 AC 756 at [30]) has a bearing on the rationality argument. Given that this ground fails comprehensively on the evidence, it is unnecessary to explore the issue.…”
- Explained — JJ Management Consulting LLP & Ors v Revenue And Customs Respondents 2020-06-22
“… investigations and prosecutions) in criminal or disciplinary proceedings (see R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756 at [30]). Corner House was itself a decision to terminate an investigation which had already begun. As Laws LJ explained in R (Bermingham) at [63] and [64] in …”
- Cited — Ukraine v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc (Rev 1) 2018-09-14
“…relevant to pleas of legitimate expectation in domestic public law; see also R v (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60; [2009] 1 AC 756, [43]-[47] per Lord Bingham and [62]-[68] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, who accepted that interpretation of such obligations by a domestic court could…”
- Cited — B v The General Medical Council 2018-06-28
“…to which particular factors to treat as relevant to the balancing exercise: cf R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60; [2009] 1 AC 756, [40] per Lord Bingham of Cornhill. They also have a wide discretion as to the weight to be given to each factor they treat as relevant. As Auld LJ stated in D…”