How many times has [2009] 1 FLR 39 been cited?

[2009] 1 FLR 39 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2009] 1 FLR 39

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2009] 1 FLR 39

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2021-02-18
“…here is no conclusive evidence that the fees have prevented people from bringing claims, the court does not require conclusive evidence; as the Hillingdon case [2009] 1 FLR 39 indicates, it is sufficient in this context if a real risk is demonstrated. The fall in the number of claims has in any event been so sharp, so substantial, an…”
Cited — FB (Afghanistan) & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-10-21
“…rlier authorities (notably R v Lord Chancellor exparte Witham[1998] QB 575 and R (Hillingdon London Borough Council) v LordChancellor [2008] EWHC 2683 (Admin); [2009] 1 FLR 39, both also court/tribunal fee cases), Lord Reed said (at [87]):…”
Cited — FB (Afghanistan) & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-10-21
“… people from bringing claims, but conclusive evidence was not required. Citing R (Hillingdon London Borough Council) v LordChancellor [2008] EWHC 2683 (Admin); [2009] 1 FLR 39, he said that “it is…”