- Cited — Simon Nigel Morton & Anor. v Julie Morton 2023-06-20
“…ell made by Hoffmann LJ in characteristically lucid terms in Walton v Walton (unreported) 14 April 1994 (cited with approval in Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18, [2009] 1 WLR 776 at [56]):…”
- Cited — Andrew McCarthy v William Allan Jones & Anor. 2023-05-25
“…at were its terms. The judge’s conclusion on those questions is one of fact: Carmichael v National Power plc [1999] 1 WLR 2042; Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18, [2009] 1 WLR 776 at [82] – [83]. There is a heavy burden on an appellant seeking to challenge a trial judge’s finding of fact, especially where he has heard oral evidence. The …”
- Cited — Joseph v Deloitte NSE LLP (Rev 1) 2020-11-05
“…tisfied if the promise or representation is “sufficiently clear and unequivocal” or “clear enough” to the second party: compare Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18, [2009] 1 WLR 776 at [15] (Lord Scott of Foscote), [26] (Lord Rodger of Earlsferry), [56] (Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe) and [84]-[86] (Lord Neuberger).…”
- Cited — Guest & Anor v Guest 2020-03-17
“…e circumstances which have actually happened, it would be unconscionable for a promise not to be kept either wholly or in part: Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18, [2009] 1 WLR 776 at [57] and [101].…”
- Cited — Habberfield v Habberfield 2019-05-23
“…ourse they would have to be kept. But as Hoffmann LJ pointed out in Walton v Walton [1994] CA Transcript No 479 (referred to in Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 19, [2009] 1 WLR 776):…”
- Cited — Moore v Moore & Anor 2018-11-27
“…e circumstances which have actually happened, it would be unconscionable for a promise not to be kept either wholly or in part: Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18; [2009] 1 WLR 776 at [57] and [101].…”