How many times has [2009] AC 311 been cited?

[2009] AC 311 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2009] AC 311

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2009] AC 311

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Applied · 1

Cited — Peiris, R (on the application of) v First-Tier Tribunal & Ors 2023-12-21
“…In the case of R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] AC 311 at paragraph 57 Lord Neuberger says…”
Cited — Re A (Parental Responsibility) 2023-06-16
“…time providing a safeguard against unjustifiable discrimination. As Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury observed in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] AC 311, para 57, “there will come a point where the justification for a policy is so weak, or the line has been drawn in such an arbitrary position, that, even with t…”
Applied — The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Hockley & Anor 2019-06-24
“…The same test was applied by Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury … in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] AC 311 …. He concluded, at para 57:…”