- Cited — Katie-Leigh Webb-Harnden v London Borough of Waltham Forest 2023-08-22
“…[2009] PTSR 809 at paragraphs 36-37…”
- Cited — THE KING (on the application of Flinn Kays) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS 2022-12-02
“… the public authority's reasoning (see, e.g, Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2009] PTSR 809 at paragraphs 36–37, and Bracking [2014] Eq LR 60, at paragraph 25). As Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC observed at para 74 of his judgment in Hotak v Southwa…”
- Cited — Sofia Sheakh (R on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth Council 2022-04-05
“…sult (see the judgment of Lord Justice Dyson in R. (on the application of Baker) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141; [2009] PTSR 809 (at paragraph 31)). Second, it does not prescribe a particular procedure. It does not, for example, mandate the production of an equality impact assessment at …”
- Cited — Gathercole v Suffolk County Council 2020-09-09
“…thwark London Borough Council [2015] UKSC 30, [2016] AC 811. Lord Neuberger also noted that, in Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2009] PTSR 809, Dyson LJ had emphasised that the PSED was “not a duty to achieve a result” but a duty “to have due regard to the need” to achieve the goals identified in para…”
- Cited — Luton Community Housing Ltd v Durdana 2020-03-26
“…“Due” means appropriate in all the circumstances: see R (Baker) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2009] PTSR 809 at [31]. There Dyson LJ said:…”
- Cited — Jewish Rights Watch Ltd (t/a Jewish Human Rights Watch), R (On the Application Of) v Leicester City Council 2018-07-03
“…[2009] PTSR 809…”