How many times has [2009] RPC 9 been cited?

[2009] RPC 9 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2009] RPC 9

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2009] RPC 9

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Applied · 1Considered · 1

Considered — Match Group, LLC & Ors. v Muzmatch Limited & Anor. 2023-04-27
“… commercial matters”. I had considered the case law of the CJEU on that question in Hotel Cipriani Srl v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd [2009] EWHC 2032 (Ch), [2009] RPC 9 at [142]-[152], and that passage was not criticised on appeal [2010] EWCA Civ 110, [2010] RPC 16 (see also Samuel Smith at [112]-[118]). Henry Carr J summarise…”
Applied — Thomas v Luv One Luv All Promotions Ltd & Anor 2021-05-20
“… the case that anyone may apply for a declaration of invalidity on that ground: see Hotel Cipriani Srl v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch), [2009] RPC 9 at [181].…”