How many times has [2010] 1 AC 319 been cited?

[2010] 1 AC 319 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2010] 1 AC 319

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2010] 1 AC 319

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Distinguished · 1

Distinguished — S (Children: Parentage and Jurisdiction), Re 2023-07-27
“… non-member state, thus clearly asserting jurisdiction as against the third country in question. Hence in In re I (A Child) (Contact Application: Jurisdiction) [2010] 1 AC 319 this court held that article 12 did apply in a case where the child was habitually resident in Pakistan. There is no reason to distinguish article 12 from the …”
Cited — S (Children: Parentage and Jurisdiction), Re 2023-07-27
“…It is also relevant to quote what Lady Hale said in In re I (A Child) (Contact Application: Jurisdiction) [2010] 1 AC 319, at [15]:…”
Cited — Thum v Thum 2018-07-12
“…been referred to a number of authorities including R v R (Divorce: Stay of Proceedings) [1994] 2 FLR 1036; In re I (A Child)(Contact Application: Jurisdiction) [2010] 1 AC 319; Debt Collect London Ltd and another v SK Slavia Praha-Fotbal AS [2011] 1 WLR 866; UBS AG v Kommunale Wasserke Leipzig GmbH [2010] EWHC 2566 (Comm), [2010] CLC…”