UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2010] 2 FLR 1900
[2010] 2 FLR 1900
· cited by
2
· influence score
13
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2010] 2 FLR 1900
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 1
Considered · 1
Citation network
[2010] 2 FLR 1900
TT v CDS (Rev 1)
Haley v Haley
cited by
Cited by (2)
Considered
—
Haley v Haley
2020-10-23
“…The Supreme Court considered agreements made in contemplation of marriage in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2010] 2 FLR 1900, quoted in both S v S and Sharland above. The Supreme Court said at [75]:…”
Cited
—
TT v CDS (Rev 1)
2020-09-18
“…[2010] 2 FLR 1900) but that is not suggested in this case.”…”
Frequently cited alongside
Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42
2×
[1929] AC 601
1×
[1980] AC 546
1×
[1982] AC 724
1×