How many times has [2011] 1 FLR 1153 been cited?

[2011] 1 FLR 1153 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] 1 FLR 1153

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2011] 1 FLR 1153

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Cited · 1

Cited — C v M (A Child) (Abduction: Representation of Child Party) 2023-12-01
“… and reports on, the views of the child”. It is also in accordance with the observations of Baker J (as he then was) in WF v FJ (Abduction: Child's Objections) [2011] 1 FLR 1153 ("WF v FJ"), at [25], that it was “clearly preferable, where the time and resources permit, for the child to be seen by the Cafcass High Court Team before any …”
Considered — Re D (A Child) (Abduction: Child's Objections: Representation of Child Party) 2023-09-14
“…In WF v FJ (Abduction: Child’s Objections) [2011] 1 FLR 1153 (“WF v FJ”), Baker J (as he then was) considered, at [21]-[22], the provisions in the previous rules dealing with the joinder of a child as a party in respect …”