How many times has [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 106 been cited?

[2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 106 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 106

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Explained · 1

Explained — Airbus S.A.S. v Generali Italia S.P.A. & Ors 2019-05-14
“…different clauses in different agreements may involve a degree of fragmentation, as explained in Sebastian Holdings Inc v Deutsche Bank AG [2010] EWCA Civ 998, [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 106. There were good reasons for such fragmentation in this case. For example, a dispute about which party was entitled to the benefit of the warranties was suitab…”
Cited — BNP Paribas SA v Trattamento Rifiuti Metropolitani SPA (Rev 1) 2019-05-07
“…(Europe) Ltd v MLC (Bermuda) Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 767 at 777 per Rix J (as he then was) and Sebastian Holdings Inc v Deutsche Bank [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 106 per Thomas LJ (as he then was) at [42] (judgment at [27]).…”
Cited — BNP Paribas SA v Trattamento Rifiuti Metropolitani SPA (Rev 1) 2019-05-07
“…edit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Ltd v MLC (Bermuda) Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 767 at 777 per Rix J (as he then was) and Sebastian Holdings Inc v Deutsche Bank [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 106 at 777 that:…”