How many times has [2011] 1 WLR 2625 been cited?

[2011] 1 WLR 2625 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] 1 WLR 2625

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2011] 1 WLR 2625

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Considered · 1

Cited — Hugh Murphy & Anor. v The Commissioners for HMRC 2023-05-15
“…be representative of those to whom an extra-statutory concession is directed: M.F.K., at 1569, and R (Davies) Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2011] UKSC 47, [2011] 1 WLR 2625 (“Davies”), at paragraph 29 (“the hypothetical representee is the ‘ordinarily sophisticated taxpayer’ irrespective of whether he is in receipt of professional …”
Considered — Robin Stait v Cosmos Insurance Limited Cyprus 2022-11-01
“…In R (Davies and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; R (Gaines-Cooper) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2011] UKSC 47, [2011] 1 WLR 2625, the Supreme Court considered two judicial reviews of the Commissioners in relation to the meaning of Inland Revenue Booklet 20 (“IR20”) which provided guidanc…”
Cited — MP, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Health And Social Care 2020-12-03
“…Lord Wilson cited that last passage in R (Davies) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2011] UKSC 47, [2011] 1 WLR 2625 (“Davies”), in which it was…”