How many times has [2011] 2 All ER 65 been cited?

[2011] 2 All ER 65 is cited by 5 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] 2 All ER 65

· cited by 5 · influence score 17/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2011] 2 All ER 65

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 5

Cited — LM (Albania) (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-07-15
“…ies is not determinative of whether they are a victim of trafficking, and referred to MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 49; [2011] 2 All ER 65.…”
Cited — Royal Mail PLC v Office of Communications & Anor 2021-05-07
“…t to bear in mind what Sir John Dyson giving the judgment of the Supreme Court said in MA (Somalia)v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 49, [2011] 2 All ER 65 at [43]:…”
Cited — MN v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 3) 2020-12-21
“…[2010] UKSC 49 [2011] 2 All ER 65 per Sir John Dyson at [31] & [33];…”
Cited — BF (Albania) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-10-25
“…-known passage from Sir John Dyson JSC delivering the judgment of the Supreme Court in MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the HomeDepartment [2010] UKSC 49; [2011] 2 All ER 65 (“MA (Somalia)”):…”
Cited — KS (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-01-17
“…In MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 49,[2011] 2 All ER 65, Sir John Dyson (giving the Supreme Court’s judgment) observed (in paragraph 43) that the Court should “always bear in mind” the last of the quotations set out…”