How many times has (2011) 53 EHRR 33 been cited?

(2011) 53 EHRR 33 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

(2011) 53 EHRR 33

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

(2011) 53 EHRR 33

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Hollie Dance & Anor. v Barts Health NHS Trust & Anor. 2022-07-25
“…is in breach of Archie’s Article 8 right to choose the manner of his death: Haas v Switzerland (2011) 53 EHRR 33;…”
Cited — Hollie Dance & Anor. v Barts Health NHS Trust & Anor. 2022-07-25
“… under ECHR, Art 8 is that a patient has the right to choose the manner of their death (Pretty v UK [2002] ECHR 2346/02, at paragraph 64 and Haas v Switzerland (2011) 53 EHRR 33 at paragraph 51) and it is not therefore for the court to substitute its own view of best interests which conflicts with those views. Again, this submission is…”
Cited — Conway, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Justice & Ors 2018-06-27
“…It has been endorsed repeatedly in later case law of the ECtHR that such matters engage Article 8(1), for example in Haas v Switzerland (2011) 53 EHRR 33, Koch v Germany (2012) 56 EHRR 6, Gross v Switzerland (2013) 58 EHRR 197 and Nicklinson v United Kingdom (2015) 61 EHRR SE7. As a result, it was common ground …”